Many Candidates Will Drop Out March 4-- Day After Super Tuesday (Alabama, Arkansas, CALIFORNIA, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia)
>
This cycle, California will have a huge role in determining who becomes president. It will also determine which candidates keep competing for the nomination after the March 3rd primary-- Super-Tuesday. It would be hard to imagine, for example, that Kamala Harris will keep going if she does badly in California. And what about Beto and Castro? Texas votes the same day. So do Massachusetts and Minnesota, which are must-win states for Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar, of course. ChangeResearch, one of my favorite polling outfits, just released the results of their April 6-9 poll of over 3,000 Californians. Some highlights:
When asked which is the most important issue, these were the top dozen mentioned:
When asked which is the most important issue, these were the top dozen mentioned:
• Illegal immigration- 17%Likely Democratic primary voters were then asked how favorable their feeling are about each candidate:
• Healthcare- 15%
• Ending corruption- 9%
• Environmental issues- 8%
• Voting rights and protecting democratic institutions- 7%
• Jobs and the economy- 6%
• Gun rights- 6%
• Education- 5%
• Taxes- 5%
• Crime and public safety- 5%
• Gun control- 3%
• Fiscal responsibility/balancing the budget- 3%
BernieOK, so who do these people who responded to all these questions, plan to vote for in the primary? I guess this is the big question,
• Very favorable- 41%Beto
• Somewhat favorable- 23%
• Neutral- 14%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 10%
• Very unfavorable- 10%
• Never heard of them- 1%
• Very favorable- 26%Biden
• Somewhat favorable- 30%
• Neutral- 22%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 10%
• Very unfavorable- 5%
• Never heard of them- 7%
• Very favorable- 39%Kamala Harris
• Somewhat favorable- 26%
• Neutral- 15%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 11%
• Very unfavorable- 8%
• Never heard of them- 1%
• Very favorable- 39%Elizabeth Warren
• Somewhat favorable- 33%
• Neutral- 13%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 8%
• Very unfavorable- 5%
• Never heard of them- 3%
• Very favorable- 34%Cory Booker
• Somewhat favorable- 29%
• Neutral- 20%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 9%
• Very unfavorable- 3%
• Never heard of them- 5%
• Very favorable- 17%Amy Klobuchar
• Somewhat favorable- 30%
• Neutral- 26%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 8%
• Very unfavorable- 5%
• Never heard of them- 14%
• Very favorable- 6%Julian Castro
• Somewhat favorable- 19%
• Neutral- 30%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 9%
• Very unfavorable- 6%
• Never heard of them- 30%
• Very favorable- 9%John Delaney
• Somewhat favorable- 21%
• Neutral- 34%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 6%
• Very unfavorable- 3%
• Never heard of them- 28%
• Very favorable- 0%Tulsi Gabbard
• Somewhat favorable- 3%
• Neutral- 33%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 4%
• Very unfavorable- 3%
• Never heard of them- 57%
• Very favorable- 5%Kirsten Gillibrand
• Somewhat favorable- 10%
• Neutral- 29%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 7%
• Very unfavorable- 8%
• Never heard of them- 41%
• Very favorable- 7%John Hickenlooper
• Somewhat favorable- 16%
• Neutral- 39%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 10%
• Very unfavorable- 7%
• Never heard of them- 21%
• Very favorable- 1%Jay Inslee
• Somewhat favorable- 7%
• Neutral- 36%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 5%
• Very unfavorable- 3%
• Never heard of them- 48%
• Very favorable- 3%Terry McAuliffe
• Somewhat favorable- 9%
• Neutral- 31%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 2%
• Very unfavorable- 1%
• Never heard of them- 54%
• Very favorable- 2%Eric Swalwell
• Somewhat favorable- 6%
• Neutral- 36%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 4%
• Very unfavorable- 2%
• Never heard of them- 51%
• Very favorable- 9%Andrew Yang
• Somewhat favorable- 12%
• Neutral- 26%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 3%
• Very unfavorable- 2%
• Never heard of them- 48%
• Very favorable- 4%Marianne Williamson
• Somewhat favorable- 11%
• Neutral- 33%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 4%
• Very unfavorable- 3%
• Never heard of them- 36%
• Very favorable- 1%Michael Bennett
• Somewhat favorable- 3%
• Neutral- 26%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 3%
• Very unfavorable- 3%
• Never heard of them- 64%
• Very favorable- 1%Mayor Pete
• Somewhat favorable- 2%
• Neutral- 33%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 2%
• Very unfavorable- 3%
• Never heard of them- 59%
• Very favorable- 24%Stacey Abrams
• Somewhat favorable- 23%
• Neutral- 21%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 4%
• Very unfavorable- 2%
• Never heard of them- 27%
• Very favorable- 23%Wayne Messam
• Somewhat favorable- 20%
• Neutral- 31%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 2%
• Very unfavorable- 2%
• Never heard of them- 22%
• Very favorable- 0%Tim Ryan
• Somewhat favorable- 1%
• Neutral- 23%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 2%
• Very unfavorable- 2%
• Never heard of them- 73%
• Very favorable- 2%Howard Schultz
• Somewhat favorable- 4%
• Neutral- 38%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 5%
• Very unfavorable- 4%
• Never heard of them- 38%
• Very favorable- 1%
• Somewhat favorable- 3%
• Neutral- 28%
• Somewhat unfavorable- 9%
• Very unfavorable- 20%
• Never heard of them- 40%
• Bernie- 22%They looked for the favorability and unfavorability of 3 polarizing national figures who I suspect you'll be interested in seeing results for. Remember, this is for all voters, not just Democrats:
• Biden- 21%
• Kamala- 19%
• Beto- 10%
• Mayor Pete- 9%
• Elizabeth Warren- 8%
• Cory Booker- 3%
• Julian Castro- 2%
• Stacey Abrams- 1%
• Andrew Yang- 1%
• Amy Klobuchar- 1%
• Eric Swalwell- 1%
• Tulsi Gabbard- 1%
• Jay Inslee- 1%
• Tim Ryan- 0%
• John Delaney- 0%
• John Hickenlooper- 0%
• Marianne Williamson- 0%
• Michael Bennet- 0%
• Wayne Messam- 0%
• Kirsten Gillibrand- 0%
Labels: 2020 presidential nomination, California, polling
2 Comments:
What? Chris Hayes and this blog don't want to know about the non-existent Russiagate and candidates' stances?
CA voters never heard of Swalwell?
Look, all your polling ever shows is just how astonishlingly stupid lefty voters are. And those that are not necessarlily stupid are bone ignorant.
Can anyone convince me that any democracy where the electorate is this ignorant and just plain stupid can possibly be any good at all?
Post a Comment
<< Home