Wednesday, December 12, 2018

The Four Freshmen

>


Establishment media, as we've been pointing out, at the direction of transpartisan DC establishment politicians, has been working overtime to tear Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez down. Her ideas and her energy are too scary for them and too compelling for activists. Fox has made her famous among the imbeciles who watch the channel. This week a national reporter called me to ask why the fuss. "She hasn't accomplished a thing yet," he said, "and the House Democrats will make sure she never does... [t]he knives are out for her."

Even before being sworn in, she's accomplished more than 75% of congressmen accomplish in a lifetime of serving. She and her posse are setting the agenda for Congress in a way no freshmen have ever done in contemporary history. She's the peoples' congresswoman and that scares the crap out of the establishment.

Let me just point to one simple metric-- twitter followers. The media has been desperately pushing pathetic New Dem and Blue Dog freshmen as the "authentic" voice of the new Democratic class. These are the nothings they want to push:
Max Rose (Blue Dog-NY)- 12.5K
Mike Sherrill (Blue Dog-NJ)- 25.4K
Katie Hill (New Dem-CA)- 26.7K
Colin Allred (New Dem-TX)- 18.1K
Abigail Spanberger (Blue Dog-VA)- 31.7K
Chrissy Houlahan (New Dem-PA)- 16.3K
And these are the twitter numbers for Ocasio and the freshman members who have been with her on the #GreenNewDeal and the forward, cutting edge agenda they are bringing to the foreground-- dismissed by ancient establishment moron Al Hunt as "bomb throwers":




Alexandria Ocasio (D-NY)- 1.55 million
Rashida Tlaib (D-MI)- 106K
Ilhan Omar (D-MN)- 258K
Ayanna Pressley (D-MA)- 116K
So that's 130,500 for the half dozen "moderates" from the Republican wing of the Democratic Party, compared to over 2 million for the four freshmen the establishment and its media arm are trying to discredit and render ineffective.



On Monday Sahil Kapur noted that "messy battles between the party’s factions risk undercutting Democrats hopes of rallying to defeat Trump in the next election, potentially costing them the chance to define the political debate and highlight favorable issues."

One of the most right-wing Democrats, Blue Dog Josh Gottheimer-- who has an "F" grade from ProgressivePunch, votes against progressive legislation almost 60% of the time and is co-chair of the Wall Street-owned and directed Problem Solvers Caucus. Gottheimer has the 3rd worst voting record among Democrats in the new Congress, only fellow Blue Dogs Henry Cuellar (TX) and Collin Peterson (MN) voting worse. Gottheimer is a member of the House Financial Services Committee and took $1,838,510 in bribes from the industries the committee oversees, more than any other members in the new Congress other than Republican House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy ($1,982,675). On the Hill, he is widely considered one of the 5 most corrupt members of Congress. Sahil forgot to mention any of that background before quoting him like this:
"Your swing votes on a lot of these issues are going to come from the middle," said New Jersey Democrat Josh Gottheimer, a co-chair of the Problem Solvers Caucus, a bipartisan group of centrists. "If you look at how we just captured the House it was through the middle, through seats like mine. And so the middle should have-- and will have-- a really influential voice in the legislation we pursue, and on how it’s crafted and shaped."
Two things Sahil also forgot to mention:

1- when Gottheimer says "the middle," he means the extreme right fringe of the Democratic Party

2- the DCCC heavily recruited and supported Blue Dogs and New Dems and undercut and sabotaged progressives at all stages of the election cycle.

One thing Sahil did bring up-- in a quote from progressive icon Pramila Jayapal: "Progressive voters were key to our victory, and our majority. I don’t think we can lose sight of that."
"Medicare-for-all," debt-free college education, bolstering collective bargaining rights for workers and restructuring the immigration system, Jayapal said. Next year won’t be like 2009, she insisted.

"Progressives have the balance of power with us. Our voice will be at the table on leadership, which was not necessarily the case back then. But we also have the country with us,” she said. "You will see us leveraging our power."

Some of the young, newly elected Democrats with passionate bases of support, such as New York’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Michigan’s Rashida Tlaib, have already made a splash with their outspokenness and willingness to clash with party leaders and establishment figures.

House progressives intend to work with outside activist groups like MoveOn and Indivisible to pressure reticent Democrats to support those types of progressive ideas and to craft messages to sway public opinion. While they’re still discussing how best to leverage their power, “we’ll use every tool in the toolbox,” Jayapal said, including attaching their priorities to must-pass spending bills to keep the government functioning.

“Sticking together as a voting bloc to help move a particular policy will be very important,” Jayapal said. It’s a tactic used successfully by the conservative House Freedom Caucus to move GOP bills to the right by refusing to provide votes until their demands were met. But it also at times resulted in stalemates that thwarted attempts at compromise.

That would set up a clash with centrists in the Blue Dog Coalition, the New Democrat Coalition and the Problem Solvers Caucus, the ranks of which will be expanded with the election of 25 Democrats in more conservative districts, like New York’s Anthony Brindisi, Utah’s Ben McAdams and Virginia’s Abigail Spanberger.

Many opposed left-leaning proposals like Medicare-for-all during their campaigns, and are positioning themselves on the right by refusing to back Pelosi or by endorsing rules changes that give more power to moderates.

...Gottheimer declined to speculate on policies like Medicare for all or debt-free college, saying the party’s focus should be on more modest proposals that can pass the Senate and be signed into law by Trump, such as an infrastructure bill, fixing problems in health-care markets, and resolving the status of young undocumented people.

He added that Democrats who “want to obstruct for the sake of it” or to “scream and yell” won’t find allies in his group of centrists [rightists].

The Blue Dog Coalition added seven newly-elected Democrats, all from competitive districts currently held by Republicans, and expects to number at least 24 come January.

Representative Stephanie Murphy of Florida, an incoming Blue Dog co-chair, said the group intends to focus on "bipartisan cooperation, fiscal responsibility, and national security."

Drawing an implicit contrast with liberals eyeing legislative proposals that lack Republican support, Murphy warned against "partisan stalemate that brings our country to a halt."
The 7 new Blue Dogs will need to be watched carefully and-- if they turn out to be as bad as Gottheimer-- primaried in 2020. Is one of them yours?
Jeff Van Drew (NJ)
Mikie Sherrill (NJ)
Xochitl Small (NM)
Anthony Brindisi (NY)
Max Rose (NY)
Ben McAdams (UT)
Abigail Spanberger (VA)

Labels: , , ,

7 Comments:

At 6:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good post, Howie. This is the sort of coverage we need if we are to have a chance of turning the corrupt ship of state away from corporatism. We need to know what any particular rep is getting, and from whom. Only then can we make good choices.

 
At 6:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

you're wasting our time again. These 4 haven't DONE anything yet and you've coronated them our "great non-white hopes". Pure hyperbole.

"She and her posse are setting the agenda for Congress in a way no freshmen have ever done..."

Worse than hyperbole. A lie. She and they have done some talking. That is all.

The agenda will be set by nancy Pelosi and her donors. And all these 4 can do is talk. They will be impotent to affect nancy Pelosi and her donors' agenda.

Dennis Kucinich did a lot of talking in 2007. He produced viable and valid articles of impeachment aimed at cheney and gonzalez. But those never got onto the agenda of nancy Pelosi and her donors, DID THEY?!?!?

Look folks... when DWT posts an article singing the praises of AOC and the others, you have to remember that these 4 look good and sound good... and that is all. They will serve to hypnotize all you lefties who want very much to believe that the democraps are your party. You'll listen to them, read what they tweet and project your own desires onto them and, by extension, that party.

But in REALITY, the only one who matters; the only one who will determine what actually gets done is not any of these. it is nancy Pelosi. and she will not be listening to these 4 for advice. she'll do what she's done for the past 3 decades (!!!) and only listen to her party's donors. In REALITY, that party, at best, is indifferent to your pathetic needs and desires, like health care. They serve corporations and the rich. THAT IS THE REALITY.

Need I remind you all what happened to Kucinich?

 
At 6:56 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

why don't we dispense with that whole cumbersome 'twits voting' shit and just let those with the most twit followers lead us? couldn't possibly be worse... or could it?

or does anyone care?

 
At 9:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Twitter followers are definitely not a great metric for measuring influence or electability. e.g. Iron Stache has 270K, Bryan Steil has fewer than 2,000. Steil still won.

I think Ocasio-Cortez et al could have a lot more influence long-term, but money and organization, donor networks still count for a lot. Social media metrics have some value, but it's a question about how much weight you assign to it.

 
At 9:34 AM, Blogger edmondo said...

Ayanna Pressley knocked off a white guy who was far more progressive than she is. Fortunately, she had enough melanin to make her a heroine to the Democrats. Identity trumps everything in the Democratic Party. Will enjoy watching the Dems self-destruct over it in 2020.

 
At 10:22 AM, Anonymous ap215 said...

Thankfully i didn't vote for Brindisi & Rose when you posted about these guys earlier in the midterms Howie & you can damn well sure these two NY corrupt Blue Dogs will be watched with their votes i promise you.

 
At 10:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:26 and edmondo, I remind you that the ONLY democrap you should spend time watching is Pelosi. She has the gavel and will be tyrannically directing the agenda. Nobody else in the caucus (well, maybe hoyer) will have ANY influence.

Pelosi's influence comes from her donors and her own cowardice.

I would have mentioned scummer, but he's impotent in the senate unless 4 Nazis commit heresy. And that ain't happening.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home