This Is What It Looks Like When A U.S. President Orders a Strike in a Muslim Country
>
Eight-year-old Nawar Anwar Al-Awlaqi is said to have bled to death over a two-hour period (source).
by Gaius Publius
"The 11-year-old was woken by the commotion outside and went to see what was going on. ... He asked them ‘Who are you?’ but the [U.S. soldiers] shot him. He was the first killed."
—Abdelilah Ahmed al Dahab, describing his son's death
When you murder people in Yemen, you murder Muslims.
—Yours truly
There's a lot of noise being made about the "anti-terrorist" strike in Yemen ordered by President Trump, and a lot of noise should be made about it.
But behind the partisan jabbings is a brutal fact — people are being murdered in these "strikes." And another brutal fact — both political parties have normalized these ... well, they must be called what they are ... war crimes.
From a report on the Trump-ordered raid (do read; it's excellent), I want to tease out just this detail (h/t Robert Greenwald of Brave New Films, via email):
Nine young children killed: The full details of botched US raid in YemenThis happens under all U.S. presidents who order such actions. More:
[...] It was a moonless night and the calm in Yakla was punctured only by the familiar sound of drones buzzing overhead.
In the middle of the night US special forces flew from the aircraft carrier USS Makin Island in Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft and landed a few kilometres from the village. ...
“The operation began when the soldiers landed next to the graveyard which lies about 2km away from our town, north of Yakla”, Sheikh Abdelilah Ahmed al Dahab said. The soldiers then proceeded on foot, flanked by military dogs, in the direction of the village. Villagers say there were about 50 soldiers.
An 11-year-old is the first hit
His son Ahmed was the first casualty. According to al Dahab the 11-year-old was woken by the commotion outside and went to see what was going on. “When my son Ahmed saw them, he couldn’t tell that they were soldiers because it was dark,” he said. “He asked them ‘Who are you?’ but the men shot him. He was the first killed. No one thought that marines would descend on our homes to kill us, kill our children and kill our women.” [...]
SEAL Team 6 attacked the home of 65-year-old Abdallah Mabkhout al Ameri, surrounding it and opened fire indiscriminately, Abdelilah al Dahab and other witnesses claimed. “When people heard the gunshots and missiles, local men rushed out of their homes to find out what was going on,” he said.I don't want to continue this, but there's plenty more at the link.
Three witnesses said the commandos shot at everyone who left their homes. In these lawless parts of Yemen every home has a Kalashnikov and the residents reached for their guns “to defend their homes and their honour,” Abdelilah al Dahab said.
The villagers say 38-year-old mother of seven, Fatim Saleh al Ameri was fatally shot by special operators while trying to flee with her two-year-old son Mohammed. “We pulled him out from his mother’s lap. He was covered in her blood,” said 11-year-old Basil Ahmed Abad al Zouba, whose 17-year-old brother was killed. “The operation began when the soldiers landed next to the graveyard which lies about 2km away from our town, north of Yakla”, Sheikh Abdelilah Ahmed al Dahab said. The soldiers then proceeded on foot, flanked by military dogs, in the direction of the village. Villagers say there were about 50 soldiers.
War Crimes
Yes, they killed some "terrorists" ... maybe ... including an 80-year-old man, though what "terrorism" means in Yemen is fully in doubt. It's actually a three-way civil war, as the article makes clear, and we may just be doing the Saudi nationalist king's dirty work.
As they article makes clear, actions like these are sparking more revenge than thanksgiving. Will those who take that revenge also be called "terrorists"? This is a global game of Hattfields versus McCoys. Were they "terrorists" too? (And which are we, the Hatfields, or the McCoys?)
But these are also war crimes. In the last century, the U.S. hung people for commiting them. In this century, what Bush initiated Obama normalized by behavior and legalized — made "lawful" — by statute. Now Trump and his foreign policy advisors have a free hand to treat anyone in the world any way they want. War crimes are a bipartisan op in this country.
And a racist one as well. If the child at the top of this piece were — I hate to say it — Caucasian, would it have stopped these Democrats (do click; do memorize the list) from putting the CIA in the hands of Mike Pompeo and his known-torturer Deputy Director?
When you murder people in Yemen, you murder Muslims. These raids, these murders, are not just on Trump. They're on every Democrat who enabled him. How much of the globalized "war on terror" is just globalized racism? Will it hurt the "Democratic Party brand" to collaborate with it?
I hope Democrats are prepared with answers to those questions. I'm certain, as Trump takes us down, they will be asked.
Scheduling note: My comments here appear regularly on Monday and Thursday, or Tuesday and Thursday if Monday is a holiday.
GP
Labels: collaboration, Democratic Party brand, Gaius Publius, Pompeo, racism, torture, Trump, War on Terror, Yemen
4 Comments:
And take us down, he will, into the swirling abyss of horror. I hold my breath for the first crisis that comes his/our way. The situation room will be a disaster of incompetence and vengeful impulsivity. Surely no clear thinking or weighing of options and consequences. And the USA, all of us, will be responsible and accountable for the damage.
So very true, Hone. And imagine the added damage Pompeo and his torturer Deputy Director will do.
They couldn't do a better job of setting us up for a strike if they were trying to.
GP
Hone... GP, may I point out the obvious here? Don't stop the blame train at those Ds. Yes they enable evil... truly.
But how did the Rs and these Ds get there to enable further evil? And whose further evil did they enable? And where was this excellent article the first time obamanation extralegally ordered many random lives snuffed for his amusement?
Voters. You want to get to the real enablers? It's us. It's voters. WE AMERICAN VOTERS, in a bigly majority, support snuffing muslim children, women, old men and the odd terrorist. And to the point in the linked article... yeah, we americans in a bigly majority LOVE torture.
If torture and murder were bad (from our perspective), cheney/bush would have been impeached, not served a second term and would be now in prison along with many dozens of lower level evildoers. Obamanation would not have been elected to continue torturing and there would not be his Tuesday meeting to finger who dies along with everyone who happens to be within the kill radius of whatever missile is fired. And if he had done that, he'd have been impeached and imprisoned along with everyone from the chairman of the joint chiefs on down to the junior officer who pulled the drone's trigger from KS somewhere.
But, from our perspective, you see, torture and murder are NOT BAD. In fact, they are quite reasonable for us Christians to torture and murder innocents... as many and as often as it amuses us... because they're scary subhuman muslims.
Sound like anyone from history? Like maybe around 1933-1945 in Germany?
US' withdraw From ALL ILLEGAL wars not Constitutionally authorized by Congressional declaration thereof.
Post a Comment
<< Home