DownWithTyranny!: Why Bernie Sanders?

The Clinton machine is now banking on a longer campaign than anyone would have imagined a few months ago when Bernie Sanders indicated he would run to represent ordinary working families and their interests. There are a lot of women who feel they are finally entitled to a woman president-- Clinton's only viable claim to the nomination now that the myth of "electability" has been shattered by months (years) of the vicious and well-financed GOP smear campaign against her-- but the momentum in the Democratic primary process is entirely with Bernie Sanders.

Clinton can't tap into the anger and frustration Americans feel about the rigged system that is holding so many people down. And she can't tap into the anger and frustration Americans feel towards dishonest, self-serving politicians. She is perceived by far too many people as part of what's wrong with the establishment. A contest between her and Jeb Bush-- as unlikely now as it was once considered "inevitable"-- would probably result in the lowest general election voter turnout in over a century.

Although the candidates are absolutely nothing alike, many angry Republicans have glommed onto Donald Trump at the same time rank-and-file Democrats are discovering a somewhat obscure Independent senator from Vermont (by way of Flatbush). Trump is playing to the right-wing mob, the personification of reality-TV inauthenticity. Sanders isn't changing a syllable of what he's been talking about since he became mayor of Burlington, and a congressman reviled by Democrats and Republicans alike, and now his state's much-loved senior senator. Castleton Polling Institute found that not only is Bernie massively leading Hillary in Vermont, he's in a three-way tie with Trump and Carson for first place among Republicans!

Nick Confessore of the NYTimes got to the heart of Bernie's growing appeal in his column yesterday:

The traditional campaign fund-raiser: a few dozen deep-pocketed donors in a quiet room, a trimmed-down stump speech from the candidate, a pantomime of intimacy.

A Bernie Sanders fund-raiser, like the one Friday at Manhattan’s Town Hall? Hundreds of supporters in a sweaty concert hall cheering a stem-winder from the candidate about the evils of fund-raising in a post-Citizens United world, where candidates spend a significant amount of time wooing the superwealthy.

He bashed Wall Street, a top source of money for most politicians, including Hillary Rodham Clinton, Mr. Sanders’s main Democratic rival for the nomination. (Attendees, who had paid at least $50 each, booed at the mere mention of banks.) He bashed the Republican debate on Wednesday, asking how the candidates could get through three hours with "not one word to say about the corrupt campaign finance system we are living in today."

Mr. Sanders bragged about not having a "super PAC"-- he is the only major candidate who does not-- earning one of his biggest cheers of the hour.

And with an enthusiasm not normally found among candidates in the age of super PACs, he bashed billionaires. "I don’t represent the interests of the billionaire class," said Mr. Sanders, who supports higher taxes on the wealthy and a tax on financial speculation. "I don’t want their money."

Shane Ryan caught up with the zeitgeist for Salon when looking to Iowa to explain why Bernie is surging and the Establishment candidate is faltering. Short version: he's talking exciting ideas and she's mouthing banal platitudes. He practices democracy; she puts up with the a version of the masses to deliver for her financial backers. She panders. She's utterly inauthentic as almost any fabulously wealthy person having to deal with working people is. Bernie himself sent a letter to his supporters about why he spoke at Liberty University and what he accomplished there:

Earlier this week I spoke at Liberty University. For those of you who do not know, Liberty University is a deeply religious institution. It is a school which tries to understand the meaning of morality and the words of the Bible, within the context of a very complicated modern world. It was founded by the Reverend Jerry Falwell, and the vast majority of people at Liberty strongly disagree with me, and perhaps you, about abortion, marriage equality, and other issues.

You might be asking yourself, "Why on earth would Bernie Sanders go there?" It is a fair question within the context of our modern politics.

I spoke at Liberty University because I believe that it is important for those with different views in our country to engage in civil discourse-- not just to shout at each other or make fun of each other.

It is very easy for those in politics to talk to those who agree with us-- and I do that every day. It is harder, but not less important, to try and communicate with those who do not agree with us and see where, if possible, we can find common ground. In other words, to reach out of our zone of comfort.

...The message I gave at Liberty University is that the moral choice is to fight income inequality, and that the just thing to do is to work to make our society more fair. Below are some of my remarks to Liberty from the video above, but I think it is important to share them with you here as well so that you can share with others how I approach these issues.

I am far, far from a perfect human being, but I am motivated by a vision which exists in all of the great religions-- Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and others-- and which is so beautifully and clearly stated in Matthew 7:12. “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the prophets.” The Golden Rule. Do to others what you would have them do to you. Not very complicated.

I told the crowd at Liberty University that I understand that issues such as abortion and gay marriage are very important to them, and that we disagree on those issues. I get that. But there are other issues out there that are of enormous consequence to our country and the world and that maybe, just maybe, we don’t disagree on them. And maybe, just maybe, we can work together in trying to resolve them.

Amos 5:24, “But let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream!”

Justice. Treating others the way we would like to be treated. Treating all people with dignity and respect.

It would, I think, be hard for anyone in that room where I spoke to make the case that the United States today is a “just” society or anything resembling a just society.

In America today there is massive injustice in terms of income and wealth inequality. Injustice is rampant. We live in the wealthiest country in the history of the world but most Americans don’t know that because almost all of that wealth and income is going to the top one percent. We are living at a time where a handful of people have wealth beyond comprehension – huge yachts, jet planes, tens of billions of dollars, more money than they could spend in a thousand lifetimes. But at the same time, millions of people are struggling to feed their families or put a roof over their heads or find the money to go to a doctor.

When we talk about morality and when we talk about justice, we have to understand that there is no justice when the top one-tenth of one percent own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent. There is no justice when all over this country people are working long hours for abysmally low wages, $7.25 an hour or $8 an hour, while 58 percent of all new income being created today goes to the top one percent.

There is no justice when, in recent years, we have seen a proliferation of millionaires and billionaires while, at the same time, the United States has the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world. How can we talk about morality when we turn our backs on the children of this country? Twenty percent of the children in this country live in poverty and that includes 40 percent of African American children. There is no justice when, in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, children in our country go to bed hungry.

There is no justice when the 15 wealthiest people in this country saw their wealth increase by $170 billion dollars in the last two years. That is more wealth, acquired in a two-year period, than is owned by the bottom 130 million Americans. And while the very rich become much richer, millions of families have no savings at all and struggle every week just to stay alive economically, and the elderly and disabled wonder how they stay warm in the winter. That is not justice. That is a rigged economy designed by the wealthiest people in this country to benefit the wealthiest people in this country at the expense of everyone else.

There is no justice when thousands of people in America die each year because they don’t have health insurance and don’t get to a doctor when they should, or when elderly people are forced to choose between food or medicine because our citizens pay the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs. That is not justice. That is not morality. That is simply an indication that we are the only major country on earth that does not guarantee health care for all as a right.

There is no justice when low-income and working-class mothers are forced to separate from their babies one or two weeks after birth and go back to work because we are the only major country on earth that does not have a paid family and medical leave policy. That is not justice. That is an attack on family values that everyone should be appalled at.

There is no justice in our country when youth unemployment exists at tragic levels – with 51 percent of African American high school kids unemployed or underemployed. No. We apparently do not have the funds to provide jobs or educational opportunities for our young people but we sure do have the money to throw them into jails. Today, the United States has more people in jail than any other country on earth, and many are serving time in inhumane conditions. That is not justice. That is the destruction of human life.

I am not a theologian or an expert on the Bible or a Catholic. I am just a U.S. senator from the small state of Vermont. But I agree with Pope Francis when he says: "The current financial crisis… originated in a profound human crisis: the denial of the primacy of the human person! We have created new idols. The worship of the ancient golden calf has returned in a new and ruthless guise in the idolatry of money and the dictatorship of an impersonal economy lacking a truly human purpose."

He also states: "There is a need for financial reform along ethical lines that would produce in its turn an economic reform to benefit everyone. Money has to serve, not to rule."

In his view, and I agree with him, we are living in a nation and in a world which worships the acquisition of money and great wealth, but which turns its back on those in need. And that must end. We need to move toward an economy which works for all, and not just the few.

Throughout human history there has been endless discussion and debate about the meaning of justice and the meaning of morality. I hope that by getting out of my comfort zone and speaking with the students at Liberty University that I can be a part of a dialogue with people who might not agree with us. I hope that some of them conclude that if we strive toward morality and toward justice, that it is imperative that we have the courage to stand with the poor and working people of our country.