Is Bin-Laden Really Dead?
>
Or did he duck out of the Wedding and join The Princess and Princess on the honeymoon, with President Obama providing a little distraction for everyone? Just asking... although the proof seems evident to everyone.
Labels: Osama bin-Laden, royal wedding
posted by DownWithTyranny @ 5:00 AM
4 comments
|
Reddit
4 Comments:
Actually, it's not clear that he died. Other sources claim he died in 2001, 2004, and 2007. The U.S. has lied about its operations in Latin America and the Middle East for decades, it hasn't provided accurate figures for civilian deaths (and has often perpetrated cover-ups), and it continues to engage in covert operations in Pakistan and Yemen. Did I mention that it still supports numerous dictators and puppet governments in various places in the world? Don't make this out to sound like some Glenn Beck conspiracy theory, when it's actually very possible that he was killed earlier and this is being done for some as yet unknown reason (possibly election related or an excuse to end the war).
He can't be dead. They keep showing clips of him walking around on TV. Sure they're the same ones they've been using for years but they were the only evidence that he was ever alive to begin with and they haven't changed.
Bin Laden has for years been running a chip shop in Vegas, dressed as an Elvis impersonator. And Obama's birthplace? I have it on good authority that he is in fact the only person who was truly born in the United States. The rest of us were actually born in Sweden.
Which explains a lot.
Face it, he was killed just like it has been reported. You're vouching for "other sources" which give ZERO attribution? You have way too much invested in prurient skepticism for skepticism's sake. Bin Laden's family survived the compound raid and told the Pakistanis who they are and what happened. I'm aware of how much our government lies, as are you. Sometimes it tells the truth, especially when it reflects well on itself.
My theory, however, on why he was executed rather than captured is that even in custody he could have disclosed who inside the Bush administration was involved in 9/11, and Obama didn't want to "look backward" at that information (tongue in cheek).
-L.P.
Post a Comment
<< Home