Saturday, January 03, 2009

Why Is Charlie Rangel Still Chairman Of The House Ways And Means Committee?

>


It's hard for me to believe that the Democrats came to power-- at least partially-- on a wave of disgust at GOP corruption, the Culture of Corruption to be precise, and that they are now tolerating the exact kind of behavior in their own caucus. The congressional caucus is committing political suicide-- and endangering the country-- by putting up with the grotesque behavior of Charlie Rangel.

Rangel is a notorious crook who doesn't belong in Congress. Within 3 minutes of being introduced to him by President Clinton over a decade ago, Rangel pawned me off on his son who made it clear money needed to change hands. I was shocked and revolted. Naively, this is the kind of behavior I expected from Republicans; it's the kind of ethics that disgrace every member of Congress who puts up with it. This morning's NY Times reveals yet more corruption from NYC's most powerful congressman, who just happens to be chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee. Nancy Pelosi has refused to remove him from his position, a position he has used to enrich himself.

This week the Times asked Rangel directly "about whether, in general terms, he had any reservations about seeking the money [as much as $10 million] and meeting with A.I.G. officials, and a major shareholder, given what the record suggests were the company’s interests before his committee." It appears to be part of a pattern of loose ethics that mark Rangel's approach to governance. It pains me to say so but the Democratic congressional caucus will forfeit the support of all decent citizens if it puts up with criminal behavior from members like Rangel. If he chairs another Ways and Means Committee meeting Pelosi should lose her job as Speaker.

Labels: , ,

3 Comments:

At 10:24 AM, Blogger OM said...

What comes first, the will to do good or the will to get rich? It seems like in many cases, the end result is the same. Just another fat cat.

 
At 9:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems everyone agrees that Pelosi (and Reid) are not the leaders we need at this time.

How do we get rid of them?

Speaking only for myself, I'm just a voter without the financial means to gain the attention of any Democractic leaders and expect them to listen to what I say.

I've never seen a president, much less been personally introduced to a congressman by a president.

Those of you (like Howie) who have access to these people likely need only tell us (the folks who are sick of this type of behavior by Democratic leaders) what the plan is to bring about change, and I bet we'd all be on board

 
At 4:23 PM, Anonymous me said...

Wouldn't that be great if we can use this to get rid of both Rangel and Pelosi? Those two turds represent some of the worst of the Democratic Party. Our country would be much better for it.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home