Wednesday, July 04, 2007

JOHN ADAMS, GEORGE BUSH AND DONNA EDWARDS

>

Not quite as bad as Bush, but...

Earlier today I looked over new a Rasmussen poll about which presidents Americans most admire. Most of it is quite intuitive.
Six American Presidents are viewed favorably by at least 80% of all Americans. Those esteemed six are led by the first President George Washington. The Father of our Country is viewed favorably by 94% of Americans. The sixteenth President, Abraham Lincoln, is the second most popular. The man who gave us the Gettysburg Address is viewed favorably by 92% (see Presidential favorable ratings). The next four are Thomas Jefferson (89%), Teddy Roosevelt (84%), Franklin D. Roosevelt (81%), and John F. Kennedy (80%).

So far, so good. The next batch, however is where the trouble begins. Before I get to that... yes, of course Nixon and Bush II are the two presidents who are the least admired. 60% assign Nixon a negative rating and 59% register the same contempt for Bush. In fact, the "very unfavorable" category is not used much to describe anyone at all. Even Nixon only gets a 25% very unfavorable. Bush, on the other hand, gets the most-- aside from William McKinley (who was also governed by an unscrupulous, much-hated Rove-like figure, Mark Hanna)-- the only president to get more very unfavorables than Nixon. And it was way more. Nixon's 25% is positively dwarfed by Bush's 40%.

None of that surprises me. What does is the overwhelmingly favorable ratings (74%) for another Bush-like figure: John Adams. Aside from John Adams, Bush is most compared to James Polk, who has a meager 27% approval, Warren Harding (29% approval), Nixon (32% approval) and the aforementioned McKinley (42% approval). Adams' presidency was what Thomas Jefferson-- for good reason-- called the "reign of witches." Today Scott Horton explained why-- and why Adam's heavy-handed rule resembles that of Bush more than 200 years later-- in Harper's. "Jefferson believed that the Federalists had overplayed their hand-- that they had manipulated threats from abroad to seize for themselves vastly greater powers than the Constitution permitted them. He also believed that their demonization and mistreatment of the political opposition was an abuse of the powers of office and an assault upon the body politick. Adams had used the power of criminal prosecution to destroy the reputations of dozens of opposition political leaders, and to throw many of them behind bars. Even Jefferson expressed concern that he might be prosecuted... He termed Adams’s tactics as 'divide and conquer.' 'This is not new,' he wrote to John Taylor, 'it is the old practice of despots; to use a part of the people to keep the rest in order. And those who have once got an ascendancy and possessed themselves of all the resources of the nation, their revenues and offices, have immense means for retaining their advantage.'"

Does this all sound disturbingly familiar? It should. Bush has been using many of the same divisive tactics, the same fear-mongering, the same narrow politicization of the national business. And it's almost over-- until Democrats, convinced it is their turn at the public trough, turn people against them and back to the Republicans. Is there a way out? Absolutely: primaries. There are too many corrupt, incompetent Democrats in Congress. We write about them all the time-- the Al Wynns, Max Baucuses, Mary Landrieux, John Barrows. Defeat slime like these and watch how fast your Rahm Emanuels and Steney Hoyers will shape up. Right now there are five progressive Blue America candidates who are seriously contending with unworthy Democratic primary opponents. For now that's where the real battle for the soul of our country lies. We'll have more coming soon. But if you want to donate-- and even small amounts help tremendously-- let me recommend the 5 with the primary battles: Victoria Wulsin (OH-02), Steve Cohen (TN-09), Angie Paccione (CO-04), John Laesch (IL-14), and, most important of all, Donna Edwards (MD-04). A victory for Donna over Al Wynn is a shot right across the bow of every faithless, corrupt Democrat on Capitol Hill. There's is nothing the American people could do between now and the February primary-- short of demanding Bush and Cheney be impeached-- to invigorate our democracy that would be more effective than replacing Al Wynn with Donna Edwards. Do the right thing... for America.

Labels: , , ,

7 Comments:

At 10:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, I gave two times when I only intended to give once, so I have supported most of the candidates you've listed.

I have just finished Glenn Greenwald's new book, A Tragic Legacy, and I am so ashamed of this country and the 2006 Congress. Fortunately, I think a few Dems who supported the 2006 Military Commissions Act (MCA) were defeated. I was greatly disappointed to see Sherrod Brown's name in the list of supporters because ActBlue gave him considerable support.

The MCA permits the administration to hold US citizens and foreigners for as long as Bush wants, without charges and without attorneys, and to torture them. In the Senate, all Republicans supported the bill. I include the Dems shame list: Carper, Johnson, Landrieu, Lautenberg, Lieberman, Menendez, Nelson, Nelson, Pryor, Rockefeller, Salazar, and Stabenow. All voted to violate the Constitution. None of them deserve future support from citizens who hold the Constitution sacred.

I'm sorry to say that 34 Dems in the House also supported the MCA: Cramer, Davis, A, Ross, Salazar, Boyd, Bishop, Marshall, Barrow, Scott, Bean, Boswell, Moore, Chandler, Melancon, Michaud, Peterson, Taylor, Andrews, Higgins, Etheridge, McIntyre, Pomeroy, Brown, Boren, Holden, Spratt, Dandlin, Davis, L, Gordon, Tanner, Ford, Edwards, Matheson.

Please don't put any of these Dems on future ActBlue lists. Should any of their names show up, I will stop giving support through ActBlue.

I highly recommend Greenwald's book. It was an important book to read today, July 4th.

 
At 11:03 PM, Blogger DownWithTyranny said...

Cando, the Democrats you metion are all, every one of them, often denounced on DWT. They are the bad guys, the ones who often vote with Bush, Cheney and the Republicans on their toxic agenda. Believe me, none of them would ever, under any circumstances be eligible to be on Blue America-- except, of course, as a target of a progressive primary against them. Many of them are in red, red districts and-- being weak men and women with no principles-- we can't expect better from them, but several, including John Barrow and David Scott of Georgia are in blue districts and they should both be held accountible by Democrats for their awful records. And, as I'm sure you know, Harold Ford-- also on your list-- was the only Democrat running for the U.S. Senate we recommended Democrats to vote against. He lost and is now head of the reactionary DLC and is busy campaigning against Donna Edwards. Kick back against the DLC and Harold Ford by contributing to Donna Edwards.

 
At 12:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blue America withdrew Sherwood Brown's name from the list of BA candidates pronto after his "torture" vote. Cando, although he may have had "considerable" support from BA prior to this, Howie and BA stepped in quite swiftly and yanked is BA creds. The dialog is still open, as I understand it, but Howie does not like being deceived.

VG

 
At 1:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

p.s.

I did not think that Sherwood Brown's explanation about the torture vote was much of an answer.

"I made a mistake". yeah, right. we know that. To my mind, that answer is of the came category as the kind of apology I've gotten when complaining about something that was said by a major newscaster. "Apology" was "I'm sorry you were offended."

VG

 
At 6:12 AM, Blogger Jimmy the Saint said...

Howie,
Why is Steve Cohen getting primaried? Is it by Harold Ford's younger brother?

 
At 8:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just stumbled across this post while looking for a picture of John Adams.

After reading this single post, I can say without too much hesitation that you are truly one of the idiocracy.

John Adams was a great man, and a great president. If it weren't for men like Adams, you would not be sitting in front of your computer blogging about George W. Bush.

If you have an imagination, try to imagine the American Colonies never having won the War for Independence, or if having won, not ever having become a nation, or having a constitution like the one we have.

Without John Adams, none of what we know as America would have come to pass.

Comparing George W. Bush to John Adams is ridiculous, at best.

 
At 8:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I came across your aged blog while browsing the internet to find a family tree of my many great grandfathers John Adams. Thankfully the last post by an anonymous writer made my reading this not a complete waste of time. I agree with this anonymous writer in saying that John Adams was one of the most influential persons to bear this country to independence. He fought and sacrificed relentlessly so that the independence of this country would be successful and not come to ruin. I would hope that you would look more to the life of John Adams and his published works before you judge a man based off of another man's opinion (which btw Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were very close friends at the birth of this country. After Jefferson tarnished the reputation of John Adams so that he may become president it took many years but John Adams wrote to Jefferson to rekindle their friendship.)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home