Wednesday, April 11, 2007

SHOW DOWN AT THE GREEN-IS-OK CORAL: GINGRICH & KERRY vs INHOFE

>


You may not like-- or even detest-- Newt Gingrich, but he certainly isn't as stupid and backward as that loony senator from Oklahoma... not Coburn, the other kook: James Inhofe. He once was. Just two years ago Gingrich was a doctrinaire denier of global warming. During last night's rather genteel debate on climate change, he agreed with John Kerry that the ship has long ago left the dock-- and that Senator Inhofe was let behind, six feet under the rising tide. The debate was what to do about it. Unlike Inhofe and the diminishing band of reactionary flat-earth Republicans that Gingrich usually agrees with, he and Senator Kerry agree with the consensus of scientists-- real ones, not the ones who are paid to pretend they agree with corporate and Bush Regime ideological doctrine so as to muddy the waters-- that climate change is being enhanced, perhaps catastrophically, through the activities of man. He went so far as to praise the new book written by Kerry and his wife, This Moment on Earth: Today's New Environmentalists and Their Vision for the Future.

Gingrich has his own book on the environment coming out in time for his presidential race next year. He argued the right-wing position on the environment, that the way to solve the problem is to give more tax breaks to corporations. In fact the Brookings and Rand sponsored debate turned into an argument about whether the problem would be solved by progressive, collective social action or by leaving it up to Big Business to come up with solutions based on company bottom lines. Senator Kerry pointed out, correctly, that no environmental crisis has ever been solved voluntarily, without government intervention. "That's like saying, 'Barry Bonds, go investigate steroids,' or letting Enron take control of pensions." Gingrich, reciting right wing cant, wasn't budging from their religion that says that regulations are bad.

When Kerry asked him how he would respond to the Know Nothings in his party like Inhofe, who still insists the whole thing is a hoax, Gingrich said "the evidence is sufficient that we should move toward the most effective possible steps to reduce carbon loading in the atmosphere." No one expects that-- or anything rational-- to slow down Inhofe. Today's MarketWatch wrote about the aftermath of the Supreme Court chiding the Bush Regime to get off the dime on the subject. "The Environmental Protection Agency, rebuked by the Supreme Court for not clamping down on tailpipe emissions, said Tuesday it is looking at a broad range of options to cut pollution from the nation's cars and trucks." Hmmm... not that far different from asking Enron to guard pensions or Barry Bonds to investigate steroids. The EPA announced that they have "finalized the renewable fuels standard program passed by Congress in 2005. The program requires domestic refiners to blend at least 7.5 billion gallons of renewable fuels, such as corn-based ethanol, into gasoline by 2012." Way, way too little and probably too late as well.

Labels: , , ,

3 Comments:

At 11:47 AM, Blogger Zappatero said...

I just think Oklahomans want some beach front property for themselves. Can you blame them?

 
At 9:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kerry? Really? Oh Jesus! Anyone but Kerry. I am embarassed for him that he had to write a book that was hopping on the band wagon of Al Gore. This guy is seriously desperate. Even if he is right, I cringe when I hear him talk about it.

 
At 12:45 PM, Blogger dwahzon said...

You might want to do a little research before typing such a comment. Kerry co-sponsored the original earth day related legislation with Al Gore back in the 1980's.

As referenced in this omnibus diary on DKos, he was one of the original founders of the very first Earth Day celebration in Massachusetts back in April of 1970. Twenty years later he was chair of the 1990 National Earth Day board. In fact, he first met his wife Teresa Heinz Kerry at an Earth Day rally. And as the biographical information on his official Senate site points out,

"Senator Kerry's concern for the environment has earned him a 100 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters, an organization which closely monitors the environmental records of members of Congress. The League commended Kerry for his "unsurpassed leadership." The Sierra Club has stated that "there is no stronger advocate in the Senate for environmental protection than John Kerry." Kerry has also received a 100 percent rating from the Humane Society of the United States."

And then there's this bit:

Chris Mooney of scienceblog.com's Intersection noted this about the Commerce Committee hearing on Climate Change Research & Scientific Integrity on 2-7-2007:

"The hearing ended on a very strong note, as Senator John Kerry essentially eviscerated a hapless representative of the Bush administration, acting Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) chairman Bill Brennan. With Kerry terming the administration's approach to climate change science and policy "the most serious dereliction of public responsibility that I have ever seen," Brennan--who tried to stick with talking points--was massively outgunned. ...Kerry's cross examination towards the end of the hearing completely stole the show."


Here's the opening question of that salvo:

KERRY: ... I was here with Senator Hollings and Senator Inouye was, when we passed the global change research bill, in 1990. And we specifically set out the following.

We said that at least every four years to give us the National Scientific Assessment, to integrate, evaluate, interpret research findings on climate change, scientific uncertainties; analyze the effects of global climate change on the natural environment, agriculture, energy, production use, land and water resources, transportation, human health, welfare, human social systems, biological diversity; analyze current trends in global change, both human inducted and natural.

Don't you think that if the IPCC report comes out in 2001 if you guys were serious about this that you might have reported to the Congress after that your judgments about that report?

You can read the rest in this blog post

And then there's this comment which was posted elsewhere in response to another blogger who failed to do his research before posting:

the League of Conservation Voters, one of the most respected environmental activism groups in the country, seems to think John Kerry holds some serious environmental cred. (That's "cred", as in credibility, not "crud", as in Bernstein's post.)

After all, in 1996 they named him one of their Environmental Champions


You should probably read LCV's profile of John Kerry in 2004:

Quote from the "Overview" section of that document:

"With a history of engagement that extends back to the first Earth Day in 1970, Senator Kerry is one of America’s premier environmental leaders. His voting record has earned him the highest lifetime LCV ranking of all the presidential candidates, and he has taken a leadership role in promoting higher fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks, combating attempts to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and in overturning efforts to weaken the Clean Air Act. On a range of domestic issues—from clean air to clean water to public lands—Kerry has repeatedly staked out pro-environment positions. His record on international issues is equally distinguished: he sponsored legislation to incorporate environmental protections into trade negotiations and has participated in international climate change negotiations beginning at the 1992 Earth Summit and extending through Kyoto. In his run for the presidency, Kerry has made the environment a central issue, devoting several significant forums to his plans for environmental action if elected. Kerry participated in LCV’s June 2003 presidential environmental debate."

Also, please note that John Kerry has publicly spoken of the book in question at least as early as December 2005. Which, I believe, was before Gore's film had even come out.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home