Monday, January 13, 2020

How Badly Will Biden's Racist Beginnings In Politics Hurt Him With Democratic Voters-- If They Ever Find Out?

>


I don't forget about politicians I hate. And my hatred for Status Quo Joe didn't begin when he decided to run for president again. Nor when he screwed over Anita Hill. Nor when he outed himself as one of the most homophobic Democrats in Congress. Nor when he led the effort to make sure Bush's war against Iraq would be bipartisan nor when he wrote anti-working family bankruptcy legislation on behalf of the credit card companies that were financing his career nor when he campaigned vigorously to gut Social Security and Medicare. No, I began hating Biden's guts long before any of that.

In the 1970s there were several prominent politicians who weren't from the former slave-holding states but whose political careers were built entirely around racism-- and the best known of them were three bigoted slobs: Louise Day Hicks in Boston, Bobbi Fielder in L.A. and Republican-turned Democrat Joe Biden in Delaware. When Obama picked Biden to balance his presidential ticket-- one black man and one long-time racist-- Biden's whole anti-Black past seemed to be instantly flushed down the memory hole.

Yesterday, former Ohio state senator and Bernie campaign co-chair Nina Turner, put the issue of Biden's racism front and center in the place where it most needs to be remembered-- South Carolina, where older African-America voters are completely responsible for Biden's high polling numbers. Turner's OpEd in The State, South Carolina's second biggest newspaper, which has a circulation of over 120,000, made the point that "while Bernie Sanders has always stood up for African Americans, Joe Biden has repeatedly let us down." Turner asked the question that Biden was hoping would never be brought up: "Will our community side with former Vice President Joe Biden, who has repeatedly betrayed black voters to side with Republican lawmakers and undermine our progress? Or will we stand with Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and a movement that has been fighting for racial and economic justice since the civil rights era?"
This critical choice is illustrated by the key differences between Biden and Sanders-- which began at the beginning of their respective careers.


As a recent NBC News headline said of Biden’s time in the Senate: “Biden didn’t just compromise with segregationists. He fought for their cause.” The NBC report quoted the NAACP’s legal director saying that one Biden-backed measure “heaves a brick through the window of school integration.”


And Biden didn’t just vote for bills designed to prevent black students from accessing white schools: in a series of personal letters he actively courted pro-segregation senators to support the legislation.

Sanders, by contrast, began his work in politics by organizing civil rights protests. As a college student, he helped lead a local chapter of the Congress of Racial Equality in its push to desegregate housing. Sanders participated in the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s March on Washington and was arrested for protesting rampant school segregation in Chicago. In addition, Sanders has been pushing an education plan that supports local efforts to combat racial segregation.

As a local elected official, Sanders also defied the political establishment by proudly endorsing Jesse Jackson’s 1988 presidential campaign; Sanders said that Jackson was a candidate “who has done more than any other candidate in living memory to bring together the disenfranchised.”

And the contrast between Biden and Sanders continued during the early 1990s.

Biden facilitated the public degradation of Anita Hill, an esteemed professor already victimized by a powerful man.

Biden also fought alongside right-wing Republicans to pass so-called “welfare reform” that reduced financial support for low-income families. Biden echoed former President Ronald Reagan’s dishonest “welfare queen” language and wrote a column conjuring an ugly stereotype of “welfare mothers driving luxury cars and leading lifestyles that mirror the rich and famous.”

In contrast, Sanders vigorously opposed these punitive cuts. “What welfare reform did, in my view,” Sanders said, “was to go after some of the weakest and most vulnerable people in this country.”


Similarly Biden worked with segregationist Republican Sen. Strom Thurmond to pass “tough on crime” legislation that targeted black communities with punitive criminal justice policies while promoting mass incarceration and harsh punishment for nonviolent crimes. At one point Biden declared that every “major crime bill since 1976 that’s come out of this Congress, every minor crime bill, has had the name of the Democratic senator from the state of Delaware-- Joe Biden.”

One of the leading dissenters to Biden’s “tough on crime” agenda was Sanders, who Vox noted was “an early critic of mass incarceration and punitive criminal justice policies.”


The contrast between Biden and Sanders also extends to economic policies.

Biden has repeatedly worked with Republicans to try to slash Social Security even though “almost three-fourths of African American beneficiaries rely on Social Security for at least half their income,” according to the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. Sanders, on the other hand, has fought to block those cuts and has proposed expanding Social Security.

Biden did the bidding of his credit card industry donors by helping Republican lawmakers make it more difficult for Americans to reduce their debts in bankruptcy court. At one point, Biden split with then-Sen. Barack Obama and almost every other Senate Democrat to help Republicans kill an amendment to protect medical debtors from predatory lenders.


Biden’s bankruptcy legislation passed in 2005 over the objection of Sanders; 12 years later ProPublica reported that “black people struggling with debts are far less likely than their white peers to gain lasting relief from bankruptcy.”

And today the differences between Biden and Sanders remain stark.

Biden opposes Democratic efforts to legalize marijuana. Sanders, on the other hand, is campaigning not only to legalize marijuana but also to root out institutional racism in our criminal justice system, outlaw private prisons, slash the prison population in half, end cash bail and hold police departments accountable.

Biden is opposing the Democrats’ push for Medicare for All, which would guarantee health care to all Americans and help address the disproportionately high maternal, infant and cancer mortality rates among African Americans. Sanders, on the other hand, is the longtime champion and author of that Medicare for All legislation.

Biden has refused to support Sanders’ bill to make public colleges and universities tuition free and cancel all student debt; this act alone would shrink the racial wealth gap between blacks and whites from 12-to-1 to 5-to-1. Sanders, meanwhile, is committed to closing that gap-- and he believes as I do that this is one of the most pressing moral issues of our time.

All of these contrasts underscore the high stakes in this primary election.

By supporting a racial justice champion like Sanders-- and his popular progressive agenda-- black Americans will forge a multiracial, multigenerational working-class alliance that will generate the high turnout necessary to beat President Donald Trump.


In standing with Sanders over Biden, we will declare that we are not going backward-- we are going forward into a future of empowerment and equality for all.
Biden's expected response: 'I am the Father Of The Civil Rights Movement and no one has done more for the Blacks than I have.' Just wait.




Labels: , , , ,

9 Comments:

At 1:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have little - make that no - problem with long-serving politicians having a problematical past. The problem is when, in the full light of present day, they fail to acknowledge their error and make amends.

Could there be better examples than Senator Robert Byrd, Justice Hugo Black, and the greatest turnaround of all President Lyndon Johnson?

In that context, I feel more comfortable with Elizabeth Warren, who by her own confession began her professional life as a Reagan Republican and has since turned the corner, than with Bernie whose entire life has followed a very narrow trajectory. Which of the two demonstrates the intellectual flexibility necessary to be (as distinguished from be elected) president?

 
At 2:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Any voter who DOESN'T know that Joe Biden began as a racist and remains one to this day cannot claim to be a democrat (both cases of the D). Their level of cluelessness is a strong indicator that they are either Trumpist or not involved at all.

 
At 4:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

@1:57, that's hilarious. You think demonstrating intellectual flexibility dictates that Bernie change his positions from right to wrong because he was right from the beginning while Warren was voting for Reagan and Bush 41?

 
At 4:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Read the book Rise of the Warrior Cop by Radley Balko on the militarization and growing power of the police in the U.S., and you'll find Joe Biden mentioned as one of the ringleaders, often to the right of Republicans. Biden even wrote the first bill for the horrific practice called Civil Asset Forfeiture, which gives the police a hunting license to simply steal money and possessions from people passing through their area under the assumption that people are guilty until proven innocent.

 
At 4:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:17, I'll dismiss the comment as indicating the true believer's tunnel vision. What will Bernie do when he learns he's been wrong about something (as everybody does) or that he can't deliver, for whatever reason, what he's promised?

I'll take the fox over the hedgehog every time, thanks.

 
At 9:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

@4:35, you mean you'll take the former Republican who lied about being a native American to advance her academic career over a lifelong progressive. FIFY.

 
At 4:33 AM, Anonymous Hone said...

Hey y'all! No one is perfect! Stop the quibbling. Stick to the big picture. Warren has courage. Changing one's position is not a crime. Just compare Bernie and Warren to the Republicans and stop with the smaller stuff. I hope that Bernie gets the nomination and chooses Warren as Vice. That is, if the Russians don't just hack and fix the whole voting process.

 
At 6:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not about Warren changing her position. It's about how she won't be able to withstand the massive assault upon them when Trump comes after her. She can't even stand up to a heckler at a rally.

 
At 6:20 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

To all above: it's all moot. give it a rest.

NEITHER Bernie nor Elizabeth is going to be the democrap nom. The DNC will pick biden the racist or pete the McKinsey-ite.

And DWT will plead with you all to vote for whichever it ends up being... and you will... and you will forget that both are total shit, that the party is total shit and picks your candidates for you ... and you'll convince yourselves to be thrilled about it.

again... and still...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home