Will The DCCC Lose TX-23 Again By Running Corrupt Blue Dog Pete Gallego?

Former Bernie Bexar County coordinator Rick Treviño

TX-23, the state's largest congressional district, stretches from the suburbs south and west of San Antonio right across west Texas into Socorro and the suburbs east of El Paso. Of the 29 counties in the district, only 4 have significant numbers of voters-- Bexar, El Paso, Medina, and Val Verde. It's the DCCC's #1 electoral priority in Texas for the 2018 midterms. But the DCCC shouldn't even have to be fighting for TX-23. They should own. The district, which is over 70% Latino, went narrowly for Obama in 2008, narrowly for Romney in 2012 and then gave Hillary a 49.8% to 46.4% win over Señor Trumpanzee. That there's a non-Hispanic Republican congressman there is testimony to the DCCC's willful incompetence. They keep running an egregiously corrupt conservative that the district hates, Blue Dog Pete Gallego.

Gallego won the seat in 2012, voted with the Republicans on virtually everything, and was promptly defeated two years later. He ran again last year and, while Hillary was winning the district, he lost to Will Hurd again, this time 109,816 (48.5%) to 106,049 (46.8%). Only as bad a candidate as Gallego could lose to a Republican here. So, of course, he's running again next year, to the delight of the corrupt conservatives in Congress who would love to see him back, helping them to make the Kings Landing swamp ever more fetid and disgusting. [Gallego, who is already openly raising money for the race, says he hasn't decided whether to try for a 4th time or not.] There are 3 other candidates so far so Gallego could have a hard time winning the nomination.

Jay Hulings just resigned as assistant U.S. Attorney and jumped in last week. He's a big-time Castro ally and their wing is pushing him in a really big way, cock-blocking the worthless Gallego at every turn. No one seems to know if Hulings is appreciably less conservative than Gallego-- he worked for right-wing war-monger Jane Harman at one time-- but he's certainly not as corrupt.

Gina Ortiz Jones is another credible candidate in the primary, although her website has, ominously, no issues page, usually a very bad sign. She a former Air Force intelligence officer who saw active duty in Iraq. Her real intelligence and armed services experience would help her go toe-to-toe with Hurd in a general election contest.

Then there's Berniecrat Rick Treviño, a San Antonio high school teacher who ran for City Council this year and narrowly (28 votes) missed a runoff. The San Antonio Bernie crowd loves him and his campaign platform is firmly committed to progressive issues like Medicare-For-All.

"My platform is not going to be tempered by considerations of what corporate donors or the establishment thinks," Treviño said. "I just know what I’m going to do is stick to my issues, stick to my platform." ...Treviño called Gallego's potential candidacy one of the reasons the teacher decided to get in the race. Noting Hillary Clinton won the district while Gallego lost in it in 2016, Treviño said of Gallego: "Why should we entrust him again? Right now there's so much on the line."

The decisions by Hulings and Treviño to enter the race come days come days after a federal court redistricting ruling that left Hurd's 23rd District untouched while invalidating two other districts. Yet the shape of the 23rd district could still be affected, as it shares a border in the San Antonio area with the 35th district, one of the two that are now set to be redrawn.

The DCCC still hasn't bothered to replace their Regional Vice Chair for the crucial Texas area, where so much is at stake. Jared Polis (D-CO) dropped out of the job, having never done anything for it anyway, after he declared he is running for governor of Colorado. So, as usual, the DCCC is giving Texas short shrift (except as a place for fundraising). This morning a member of Congress asked me if the NRCC is as dysfunctional as the DCCC. It's also dysfunctional but in different ways. They'll never be as incompetent as the DCCC under Pelosi but they're close behind.

Can A Moral Victory Become An Actual Victory?

-by Zack Lyke

I had just come off managing the Wakely 2016 campaign. I was tired. The team scrapped, we fought, but ultimately we failed. There were some positive signs, though. Numbers that exceeded experts’ projections and progressive enthusiasm that folks in the area had long forgotten or abandoned. At the North East Bexar County Democrats club meeting this past December, in the middle of my presentation of the club’s coordinated campaign efforts, a man rose and suggested the club give a standing ovation for Wakely’s 2016 efforts.

  That man had also run against Lamar Smith, twice. In fact, I first met him during his second run against Smith when I was the president of the Young Democrats club at my high school in 2006. He’d last offered himself against our Republican state senator in 2012 and had also previously lost a couple of close city council races. He believed in running to put progressive values forward and at the age of 66 he said he wanted one more go at public office. This time it would be San Antonio city council in District 9, often regarded as the most conservative district in San Antonio. I had always admired his efforts and his almost-too-perfect political name, John Courage. He later approached me and asked me to manage the effort. After looking at the numbers, I had one condition: bring back the principal Wakely 2016 team.

I got my wish, and we were ready to roll.

It was early in the campaign and we were focused on who we figured to be our primary opponent, a Chamber-of-Commerce-backed Republican that was the chair of a private tourism council. We’d set up the race really to be between our two campaigns, and saw this race as a unique opportunity to immediately capture the anger and frustration from the 2016 cycle. San Antonio’s municipal elections are typically in the month of May in odd-numbered years. We’d eventually get our projected matchup in a June run-off, but the seat we were after was a vacancy. 8 other campaigns faced us in the general as San Antonio’s municipal elections are non-partisan. These candidates ranged from Congressman Will Hurd’s girlfriend to social conservatives that defended conversion therapy camps. We figured (accurately) that the majority of them would split the vote, but it really highlighted how conservative this district was.

We had hope in the run-off, though. The frontrunner had received only 24% to our 22%, despite having the backing of the last 5 people to represent District 9, the endorsement of the chief San Antonio newspaper, and every business-related endorsement that you could possibly imagine. That meant there wasn’t just progressive frustration in the north side of San Antonio. It meant folks of all political persuasions were likely frustrated with the status quo.

While we came up second in the early vote of the general, we took the most votes on election day. Our polls strategy worked. We had the momentum. The progressives were firmly behind us so we expanded our field efforts. New lists were cut. We were now going after habitual voters. All of them. We stopped caring about party. We put the people’s issues first and the partisanship aside. Our campaign realized that our opponent wasn’t working very hard and that only made us post longer hours. We felt like we were outworking the other side, but needed to wait for the numbers to come in.

With the early vote in, we realized about 30% of the voters in the run-off had not voted in the general. That was a good sign based on our expanded effort. There was a looming number though, 54% of all District 9 early run-off voters had voted in the 2016 Republican primary. Based on our targeting, we’d need about 15-17% of them to “crossover” in order to win.

The polls closed on election day June 10th at 7pm. At 7:08pm, the early vote totals were posted. Our campaign had worked so hard until the polls closed that hardly anyone was in the office when we found out that we’d won the early vote. I was with about 3-4 volunteers, 1 staffer, and a reporter from a local online news outlet as we continued to set up for our watch party. We thought we’d be there all night. John Courage hadn’t even arrived yet. I looked at the numbers and said “Holy shit, we probably just won the election.” The reporter asked me how I knew, and it was simple. Our opponent’s campaign had only posted a total of 5 hours of facetime across 2 polling sites on election day. We got them early, I knew we would get them late.

We took the election day vote by nearly the same margin we took the early vote. With over 8,000 votes cast for our candidate, it was the most of any district in San Antonio. Our race was heralded as the most stunning upset in San Antonio council history by a popular local columnist.

Now John Courage gets to serve on what’s being called San Antonio’s most progressive council ever. He’ll do a fantastic job, and I’m so grateful that he gave me the opportunity to manage this effort. I also want to take this opportunity to thank John’s wife, Zada, who agreed to fund this campaign and let me do it my way. I hope I didn’t give the Courages too much anxiety in this process. In private I have the mouth of a sailor and they’re wonderfully decent people, so I know at times it was probably difficult to listen to me. Our field director, Colt Osburn, hardly slept and when he did, it was sometimes at our office. Our social media director, Allison Pope, kept the community heavily engaged and active. Bryan Naylor, Babette Olson, Ryan Kirby, and Sybil Morgan were our volunteers who probably showed up every day of this campaign. They all deserve far more than a shout out but it’s all I have to give at this time. It’s late and I’m sure I’m missing people, but please don’t hold it against me.

I’m so tired again...

but god damn, it was worth it