Saturday, December 14, 2019

Another Point Of View: Lessons for Bernie from Britain 2019

>


-by Tim Russo
Yesterday, the Republican wing of the Democratic Party couldn't wait to declare that Corbyn's loss in the U.K. meant that only a right-wing Democrat could beat Trump here. Bloomberg-- an actual Republican calling himself a Democrat and trying to buy the Democratic nomination-- called the election results in the U.K. a "catastrophic warning" to Americans. In a swipe at Bernie, he asserted that "Americans want change but I don’t think they want revolutionary change." Status Quo Joe also tried pinning Labor's loss on Bernie and Elizabeth, arguing that Boris Johnson’s resounding victory should warn Democrats against veering too far left in their fight to defeat Trump. Biden, at a fat cat fundraiser in San Francisco, gloated "Boris Johnson is winning in a walk... Look what happens when the Labour Party moves so, so far to the left. It comes up with ideas that are not able to be contained within a rational basis quickly." So let's turn to our old friend Tim Russo to get a broader understanding of this than Status Quo Joe or Little Michael will ever have. Tim worked for both the successful Bill Clinton campaigns and in the U.K. for Tony Blair's 1997, 2001 and 2005 campaigns. He knows something about U.K. electoral politics.
-DWT
Trying to reverse an election result is suicidal. The good news from yesterday’s election is we will never again hear anyone claim #RussiaDidBrexit. British voters wanted Brexit in 2016, and they will damn well have it, even if they have to get it by giving a landslide to Boris bloody Johnson, mate. In the US, voters wanted Trump, and no amount of “impeachment” performance art smearing of Laurie Anderson’s shit into her own hair (Hillz) while Yoko Ono screeches in the corner scratching at the strings of a cello with her teeth (Pelosi) will reverse that. The opportunity for Bernie Sanders here is abundantly clear-- he should oppose impeachment. Should have done so some time ago, but there’s still plenty of time to step away from the cliff Labour has spent 3 years hurtling itself over.

It’s suicidal to compromise with centrists, which is why centrists propose it. Since becoming leader in 2015, and accelerating since the 2017 election which saw Labour nearly win, Corbyn bent over backwards to reach out to the Blairite rump of centrist New Labour dead enders, who refused the Brexit result, demanding another referendum. It was folly. On Brexit, Corbyn thus contorted himself and Labour into a caricature. Everyone knows Corbyn’s been at best an EU skeptic his entire life. Corbyn’s (and historically, Labour’s) natural position is to argue Lexit-- a left Brexit-- that the EU is a capitalist vampire squid feeding upon us (conveniently, also true). But by this 2019 election, Remoaners hell bent on a second EU referendum had forced Corbyn to not just put a second referendum into the Labour manifesto by last September’s party conference, reversing the 2017 promise to respect the 2016 Brexit result. They even forced Corbyn, on national television no less, to the point of promising himself in a debate last month to not even take a position in that promised second EU referendum, a plainly seen cowardice Corbyn claimed as some sort of “leadership”. Idiocy.

Goal ThermometerWinning the nomination is only the opening bell. It’s a common Yankee mistake to assume the smear that Labour under Corbyn became a Nazi antisemitism hive comes from the Tories. Third Way Blairite dead enders launched that smear in spring 2015 before Corbyn even became leader, and have only accelerated it. Not a day has passed since Corbyn became Labour leader in 2015 without knives of this nature plunged into his back, deeper every single day, by his own party. Centrist petty bourgeoisie will not just go away-- they are in an existential fight for their existence as capitalism slowly collapses around them, thus will only get more desperate, foul, and dangerous.

Go for broke. When Corbyn became leader, my only policy concern stateside was whether or not Labour under Corbyn would promise in an election manifesto, as it had before World War II, to abolish the medieval relic of the City of London Corporation, the world’s largest tax haven black hole. Never happened, in both Corbyn manifestos. Since the City is a thousand years old, has no constitution, and is nothing but a set of fangs sucking on the world, if history remembers Corbyn for anything for very long, that failure will be what sticks. Corbyn regularly pre-compromised in this manner, for example, promising that re-nationalization of British rail would be somehow “funded”, as if “shareholders” needed “compensation” for their trouble. Why? That’s like having to pay someone who stole your house then destroyed it to get your house back. Complete madness.

A movement must become a machine. Corbyn’s Obama like tendency to pre-compromise reached full flower in the 2018 conference fight over whether or not to subject Labour MPs to mandatory re-selection every election (like a US primary), rather than as now, automatically. This was how the movement within Labour wanted to get rid of the recalcitrant coup plotters-- just toss em out. Alas, Corbyn again compromised with the snakes whose sole purpose was to poison him, creating a strange “trigger process” requiring massive organization merely to put selection on the agenda of a local constituency Labour Party. Unless institutionalized, movements fizzle into moments, which is what happened to Corbyn’s moment. Like Occupy and the Arab Spring before it, or Bernie Sanders 2016 after it, when a movement is slowed to a stop, it scatters to the four winds in a thousand directions, becoming disillusioned and despaired, incapable of being reborn. Movements are not bottomless wells of energy to be tapped on demand. They must be capitalized on, immediately, to become machines which operate independently of any leader, or moment, or idea. A movement must become power, or it is wasted and lost.


There’s always a bright side. There is simply no point in taking seriously any of the people who wish to destroy you. You must defeat them, then build power on top of their dead carcass. The forces of capital know this very well-- they don’t need to rely on the ephemeral moments movements create; they already have power, bottomless billions of it, and will never stop using it. Likely proving this deliciously will be McKinsey Pete Buttigieg in the next 2020 debate. Even Liz Warren, capitalist who loves markets to her bones, will preach at us to #BeCareful! about moving too leftward! To a fundraiser of ghoulish rich rattling their jewelry at him, of course, the slowly bleeding out Joe Biden gasped for breath with this same ‘warning’ as if Brexit never occurred, as if he hadn’t crafted capital’s incarceration police state end stage with his own hands still dripping with the oil blood of Iraq, whose greenhouse gases burn the planet to a cinder for profit as Joe sucks on his wife’s fingers. No wonder Uncle Joe has trouble breathing-- he’s choking on what he himself has wrought. I had hoped a Labour victory this month would show the world a socialist party could win in half of the transatlantic “special relationship” that is the foundation of neoliberal capitalism. I guess we’ll have to settle for a few hard lessons that really need to be internalized before the Iowa caucuses on February 3, 2020, to show a socialist can win in the more important half of that transatlantic relationship. Timing is everything, as the saying goes.

Labels: , , , ,

9 Comments:

At 9:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

.. um.. a socialist will never be allowed to win by the DNC or their donors. And a socialist probably cannot win with voters inculcated since birth to react viscerally to the word, whether applied correctly or not.

capitalism is the religion here. nobody studies it and few understand the first thing about it, but they are still blindly, unquestioningly devout. It will kill the poorest and rape the rest. And, like cat'licks with small kids, nobody practicing that also becomes its victim will dare leave.

humans are stupid that way. and americans are nothing if not dumber than shit.

The only thing that the uk vote should teach anyone is that when money drives parties, nobody is worth voting for. And when voters decide, irrationally, to adopt a belief, nothing at all can disavow them of it. And rational thought cannot overcome hate, fear and greed. humans are funny that way.

 
At 10:35 PM, Blogger paul lukasiak said...

The question isn't "what lessons can Democrats learn from the British election?

The real question is why didn't the Labour party learn the lessons from the Democratic defeat in 2016?

I mean, the Democrats ran against a offensive, unfit buffoon with a candidate who was deeply unpopular throughout much of the country – and managed to lose.

So what does Labour do? Run against a offensive, unfit buffoon with a deeply unpopular politician as the party’s standard bearer. And surprise!!! Labour lost.

 
At 10:50 PM, Blogger Alloy said...

Three things:

1. Glad Tim wasn't active during Watergate. By his logic, Nixon should have gotten away with his crimes because holding him accountable would have "nullified" the 1972 election. Impeachment, which is clearly in the Constitution, is NOT the same as ignoring a referendum. If Bernie does what Tim suggests on that point, he'll be kneecapping his own campaign.

2. Corbyn was UNPOPULAR among the general British public. By 40 freaking points! I know the media and parts of his own party were out to get him, and I'm impressed by his courageous stand against austerity and fight to make the British economy more fair, but maybe the next Labor leader can both defend the NHS AND not call himself a friend of the IRA and Hamas?

3. In his entire argument, Tim never mentions a HUGE elephant in the room: Scotland! That region, alongside the "Red Wall" and the big cities like London, used to be Labor's base. It's SNP territory now, and I don't think that a hard Lexit, as good as it might sound elsewhere, would help win Scotland back. Without that region, I don't see how Labor regains the prime minister's seat. Regional division, I'm afraid, is trumping class voting.

I do agree that simply putting the centrists back in charge won't help anything. After all, they did even worse than Labor. But I think that Tim has a few blinders of his own in this analysis.

 
At 1:39 AM, Anonymous Tim Russo said...

i notice no comments address Brexit. oh well. i tried howie!

 
At 4:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The more I read about Corbyn, the more puzzled I am that he became leader of the Labour party. He gives a more rousing speech than he inspires through his Obama-like, self-defeating actions. Thus, comparing him to Sanders is more like apples and origes. Sanders has a huge following, whereas Corbyn only has a huge defeat because he couldn't raise much support.

I have tried watching the British business news to get a feel for how the investors see Brexit. Those that only gloat about how much richer they will become I dismiss entirely. Those who express concern that Brexit -especially a No-Deal version- is only going to cause a big expensive mess, and is likely to result in the breakup of the UK as the Scots and Northern Irish decide that they have had enough of England ruining their opportunities for them. Wither Wales? Still uncertain at this time.

I have read projections regarding a similar separation of the United States as the Republic slowly decays as all dead things do. Being a resident of California, a State with a Top Ten economy, I can sympathize with the Scots regarding the nation as a whole dragging us down. I find that my opposition to separation is weakening, although I'm not yet ready to commit to it.

So chin up, Tim Russo! Your mission to stimulate a Brexit comment has been accomplished successfully!

 
At 5:54 AM, Anonymous Tim Russo said...

obviously, Dear Mr. Anonymous (perfect) you've read very little about Corbyn, since you claim "Corbyn only has a huge defeat" which means you either don't know about the 2017 election, or the two leadership elections. typical.

as for "watching the British business news", welp. what is there to say? any moron with the slightest exposure to Brits in Britain would know that Britain has never liked Europe, or Europeans, or the EU, or the Euro, and at the first chance would get the hell out of it. and here we have it! and like recalcitrant brain dead Hillbots stateside, British centrism pretends a fantasy world, where elections don't happen, and if they do, the result doesn't matter, and all it takes is a prissy little temper tantrum in pink hats to reverse it. AHOY MATIES!

eat me.

 
At 6:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"There is simply no point in taking seriously any of the people who wish to destroy you."

Words to live by.

 
At 11:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No thank, Russo. I wouldn't feed you to hogs.

I must have touched a nerve for you to react like a MAGAt would if I chided them over their blind support for their waste of humanity.

It doesn't matter what Corbyn did in the past. He has led his nation to the slaughterhouse with this horrible campaign. He's no leader. His party no longer thinks so either.

 
At 1:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The lesson Bernie SHOULD have learned was back in '16 when he was ratfucked by the party he thinks he is a member of.

If he didn't learn that lesson, I doubt he can learn any lesson.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home