Dennis Cardoza, Über-Corrupt California Blue Dog, Savagely Attacks President Obama

Blue Dog and corporate shill Dennis Cardoza is retiring-- but not before taking a vicious swipe at President Obama, something as bad as you'd expect from any Republican. And-- let's be real-- what is a Blue Dog anyway, if not a Republican who organizes with the Democrats and then votes with the GOP on the crucial issues? Cardoza, in fact, has been one of the worse, particularly considering he isn't from Alabama or Mississippi or Texas, but from northern California. Career-long, Cardoza has been a middle-of-the-pack Blue Dog, voting just over half the time with the Democrats on crucial issues and just under 50% of the time with Republicans. This past year, however, he went for a walk on the wild side, making him one of Boehner's and Cantor's go-to-Blue Dogs, someone they could almost always depend on to cross the aisle and vote with the GOP. So far this session, Cardoza, who no longer has to worry about reelection (he's finally retiring to K Street), has voted with the Republicans 62% in crucial roll calls. That score is worse than some of the most reactionary Democrats' in Congress-- worse than Heath Shuler's, Mike McIntyre's and Jim Cooper's. In fact, more right-wing than Republican Walter Jones'! (One of the few Democrats with a worse score than Cardoza's is is best bud's Jim Costa, the one he made the deal with to stay in the House while Cardoza goes off to lobbyist land. Costa has voted with the GOP just under 75% of the time this year.)

These two are examples of why Blue America started our BadDogs page. Last year we helped rid the House of Alabama Blue Dog Bobby Bright, the Democrat who voted most frequently with the GOP-- and who was campaigning on a platform of voting against Nancy Pelosi as Speaker. This year Cardoza and Costa were both on our consideration list, although, with Cardoza going off the K Street, Costa is even more likely to get the Bobby Bright treatment.

Yesterday's startling OpEd by Cardoza in The Hill must have had President Obama wondering why he bothered to coddle the Blue Dogs for the past 3 years-- even announcing that in his heart he is a Blue Dog. Cardoza, a typically treacherous Blue Dog:

After observing President Obama for the last three years, it has become obvious to me that the president might prefer to be a university professor rather than do the job he holds today. While he might not realize that he feels this way, the evidence is very clear to those who work with or watch him closely. 

Let me be clear-- I’m not trying to disparage professors. But anyone who wonders why the president is not crushing the weak Republican field only needs to examine how President Obama has behaved more like Professor Obama: 

In the president’s first year in office, his administration suffered from what I call “idea disease.” Every week, and sometimes almost every day, the administration rolled out a new program for the country. There was no obvious prioritization and, after the rollout, very little effort to actually pass the latest idea/imperative/plan/edict. Instead, the new programs just kept coming, with the new proposals constantly stepping on the previous day’s message. This rampant “idea disease” squandered the tremendous goodwill generated by the Obama campaign’s message of “hope,” tainting the president’s personal appeal. As Democrats in Congress, we often felt like we were drinking water out of a fire hose, trying to simultaneously deal with past failures of the Bush administration and the avalanche of new initiatives from Obama. This lack of focus also made it easy for congressional Republicans to stall and foil many of President Obama’s best initiatives-- which they did with relish!

Early in his administration, President/Professor Obama repeatedly referred to “teaching moments.” He would admonish staff, members of Congress and the public, in speeches and in private, about what they could learn from him. Rather than the ideological or corrupt “I’m above the law” attitudes of some past administrations, President Obama projected an arrogant “I’m right, you’re wrong” demeanor that alienated many potential allies. Furthermore, the president concentrated power within the White House, leaving Cabinet members with no other option but to dutifully carry out policies with which they had limited input in crafting and might very well disagree. From my experience, this was especially true in the environmental, resources, housing and employment areas. Not by coincidence, these areas have also been responsible for much of the president’s harshest critiques.

One former administration official told me directly that the people in the White House “NEVER TALK TO REAL PEOPLE.” Another former Obama staffer confided to me that it was clear to him that the president didn’t mind giving speeches (lectures), but really avoided personal contact with members of Congress and folks outside the Beltway. “He doesn’t seem to derive energy from spending time with regular people the way Clinton did. He rallies to give speeches for the big crowds, but avoids individual contact,” the former staffer recalled. This “arms-length” attitude extends to top decision-makers in the president’s administration. A senior housing official recently told me that, despite the fact that he was responsible for crafting policies to stem the foreclosure crisis, he had personally never met with a homeowner who had been foreclosed on. 

The president’s disinterest in input from those outside his inner circle is costing him many wasted opportunities. Recently, a senator told me Obama went to his/her state, but issued an invitation for the senator to attend the event only the day before. “I represent a must-win state and lead the president in approval ratings by nearly 20 points. He was totally off-message for what my people wanted to hear. Doesn’t the White House get it? I don’t need him, he needs ME!”  

Many on the Democratic side wish Hillary Clinton, Gov. Jerry Brown (Calif.), Gov. Martin O’Malley (Md.) or Gov. Andrew Cuomo (N.Y.) were running instead, but the president still has time to learn a thing or two from these skilled politicians. I’ll still take Professor Obama over the “goat rodeo clowns” the Republican field offers, but I fear the overall student body-- American voters-- will give him a failing grade next November if he doesn’t improve his performance.

Again, the Bad Dogs page is all about Blue Dog extinction. I don't know which K Street firm Cardoza will wind up at, but I bet it will be "bipartisan" and I bet his Blue Dog buddies will be very receptive to his suggestions, especially Costa. Are these people as bad and as corrupt as Republicans? 100% (which is more than 99.9%).