Whew! Now that "Junior" Assad has accepted the cabinet's resignation, everything's going to be jim dandy in Syria, right?
>
(Oh, and a couple of thoughts about Libya)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBQEKJ6rMVm8cd9aHkrjR1Xjs8aOmU3w0ruSLE3LBM2q5x7aQxqf-8YaYnqGZzVtPND10_oBN74G_F7AfOZW-FZuYSH4H7vkW4OdTVE1H3lu1q1NjLC4WSyLA4sbhddIeEiBhY/s400/Syria.jpg)
by Ken
What a relief to know that the problem in Syria was just the cabinet! Thanks goodness that's taken care of!
As for the Libyan mess, you probably can't believe how much I don't want to get into it, especially considering how uncomfortably far out of step I'm finding myself with my deliriously smug compadres on the Left. Nevertheless, I will throw out a couple of thoughts.
(1) The morally exalted, doubt-free high-grounders don't seem to get that people who aren't unambiguously and unalterably opposed to military invention in Libya, or just don't know what exactly to think, understand every word of every argument they make against intervention, every bit as well as they do, and in all likelihood better. This is the cause of our agony, of which the high-grounders don't seem to be experiencing any at all.
(2) On TV I saw Secretary of State Clinton evoking the memory of the genocide in Rwanda, and our failure even to attempt to do anything about it. She wondererd how we would live with watching inactively as Colonel Qadaffi launched his massacre of his enemies. Others, in the same vein, have raised the specter of Srebrenica, where again we knew it was going to happen, then knew it was happening, and stood by. In response I've heard from the high-grounders shameful smart-aleckry, every kind of intellectual sophistry, and a heaping helping of fairly monstrous character assassination, but amid it nothing that constitutes an answer to Secretary Clinton's point. I would like to think that the actual answer on the Left isn't: Well, let the slaughter begin, yee-ha, get the popcorn going! (Organic, of course. And maybe some nice vegan wienies.)
#
Labels: Hillary Clinton, Libya, Syria
5 Comments:
And her husband being President then (shared Presidency, anyone?) has nothing to do with her wanton use of those facts to bolster her new (old) argument?
Or am I confused?
Cause it sure seems like she thinks we are.
Or hopes we are.
Cause no one knows history (or soon, can read) but them.
S
evoking the memory of the genocide in Rwanda, and our failure even to attempt to do anything about it. . . .
raised the specter of Srebrenica, where again we knew it was going to happen, then knew it was happening, and stood by.
I guess I'm not as confident as you are that slaughter as a response to slaughter is a good idea. But then I guess I'm not as morally exalted and doubt free as you are.
I am sure that everyone who quotes to me that we have saved 100,000 innocents with our war can tell me just how they came up with those figures.
As had long been predicted, Syrian President Bashar Assad indeed delivered his Wednesday address on the growing unrest in his nation. But while the speech was expected to be a plea for order and a promise of myriad reforms, it was instead a defiant moment.
Syria Must have discuss with their protesters with peaceful. If they fight with their protesters they cant achieve what they want so they should have a talk with their protesters.
Post a Comment
<< Home